Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Meek

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Harris. Tried below before Hon. Chas. E. Ashe.

1Opinion of the Court

GILL, Associate Justice.

This is an action by appellee to recover of appellant the value of a trunk and its contents, consisting of clothing and tools, which had been shipped as baggage over appellant’s line of road, and which was alleged to have been lost through the latter’s negligence.

The loss of the trunk and its contents was denied by appellant, and its due delivery was averred. It was further contended by appellant that the articles sued for did not properly come within the definition of baggage, and therefore the company could not be held liable therefor. To this appellee opposed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stroud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. House v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Schaff v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. House v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API