Legal Opinion

State v. J. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 19, 2007No. M060651; A133061Published

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks reversal of an order adjudicating him to be a mentally ill person and committing him to the Department of Human Services pursuant to ORS 426.130. He asserts that (1) the trial court erred in finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he was a danger to himself and others and was unable to provide for his basic needs, ORS 426.005(l)(d), and (2) even if the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court’s finding that appellant is mentally ill, the court erred when it determined that he was unwilling, unable, or unlikely to participate in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RainboltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. D. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. RainboltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API