Legal Opinion

Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 20, 1996No. 95-3311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Judge.

The appellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We conclude that the motion was properly denied except as to the allegation that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to raise a hypothesis of innocence (as specified in ground 11), and in refusing to allow the appellant to testify (ground 7). Although the court found that these alleged deficits would not have affected the outcome of the trial, the appealed order contains no substantiating attachment and such harmlessness will not be presumed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Goswick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API