Legal Opinion

Kreielsheimer v. Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1958No. 7556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in an action based upon an alleged agreement to execute reciprocal wills. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence the trial judge entered judgment for defendant on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to establish the agreement relied on, without, however, making the findings of fact required by Rule 41(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the pertinent portion of which provides:

“After the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant, without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stancil v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1961
  2. Lam Man Chi, Lum Hong and Young Sau Yu v. E. P. Bouchard, as District Director for the Immigration and Naturalization Service of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Lappin v. LappinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Kreielsheimer v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Sunnyslope Builders Supply, Inc. v. ModessittArizona Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API