Legal Opinion
Chicago, South Shore & South Bend Railroad v. Pacheco
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1932No. 14,310PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockyear, J.
The appellant operates an electric railway from Michigan City, Indiana, west through Gary to Chicago, Illinois. The appellee was an employee of the appellant but had severed his connection with his employer. On April 16, 1928, he had come to the depot of appellant in Gary for the purpose of taking a train to Michigan City, Indiana, to secure wages due him from appellant. He had been provided with two workmen’s passes, one for the trip to and one for the trip from Michigan City. Instead of getting on an east-bound train going to Michigan City, he got on the west-bound train going to Chicago.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Slattery v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Rhodius v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Portsmouth Street Railroad v. Peed's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Feitl v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hamling v. HildebrandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Bassemier v. SartoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
- New York Central Railroad v. VerkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
- New York Central Railroad v. VerkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954