Legal Opinion
RJG Cab, Inc. v. Hodel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 23, 1986No. 85-1573PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, RJG Cab, Inc. (RJG), and Geraldine H. Sweeney (Sweeney), and the plaintiff-intervenor, Philadelphia Electric Co. (PECO) [hereinafter collectively “plaintiffs”], appeal a final order of the the district court dismissing for lack of standing and ripeness their challenge to the constitutionality of section 155 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 1983, Pub. L. No. 97-377, 96 Stat. 1830, 1919-20 (1982) (the Warner Amendment or section 155). The government contends that this appeal should be dismissed for lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perelman v. PerelmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In Re Seneca Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Horvath v. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States Department of Energy v. Seneca Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Virgin Islands Government Hospitals & Health Facilities Corp. v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.