Legal Opinion

Handy v. Kraft

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 9, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Phyllis Handy appeals from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying her petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm.

Handy is the plaintiff in a civil action pending in the Wrentham Division of the District Court Department. A judge in that court denied her motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. Her petition to the single justice sought relief from that interlocutory ruling.

The case is before us pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 2:21, as amended, 434 Mass. 1301 (2001). That rule requires Handy to “set forth the reasons why review of the trial court decision…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Danusis v. LongoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API