Legal Opinion

Urdangen v. Fryer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 12, 1918PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — F. D. Letts, Judge. Action on the alleged settlement and for services resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.-—

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd J.

i. compromise AND SETTLE-meet: eonsiaeration: unclaims03 I. The petition alleged that the parties hereto entered into an agreement x 0f settlement, March 4, 3914. whereby de- ' ' 7 0 fendant undertook to pay plaintiff the sum of $1,000 by executing a note for that amount and mortgage to secure the same; and that, though plaintiff complied with the terms thereof, the defendant failed and refused to carry out his agreement. In a second count of the petition, plaintiff demanded compensation for expenses and services subsequently rendered.

The answer was a general denial. Subsequently, an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. DotyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Greenlee v. MosnatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Keck v. Hotel Owners Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Graf v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Kraft v. West Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. First National Bank v. BrowneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Messer v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. Duke v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API