Legal Opinion

Hightower v. Aramark Educational Services, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 30, 2013No. 12-60931UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiffs-Appellants George Hightower and Hightower Foods, LLC (collectively, Hightower) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Aramark Educational Services, LLC (Aramark) on Hightower’s claim that Aramark tortiously interfered with Hightower’s lease with Mississippi State University (MSU). We affirm.

Hightower formerly operated a Subway restaurant in MSU’s student union. While Hightower’s lease remained in effect, MSU issued a public “Invitation to Negotiate” (ITN), requesting proposals for the operation of MSU’s dining and catering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Thomas C. Oglesby v. Terminal Transport Company, Inc. And Local 728, International Brotherhood Ofteamsters, Chauffeurs and WarehousemenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent, PA v. MERKEL & COCKE, PAMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lincoln General Insurance v. De La Luz GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Alfonso v. Gulf Publishing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas Mckay v. Novartis Pharmaceutical CorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API