Legal Opinion

Bowser v. . Wescott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, J., dissenting, and HOKE, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. It is contended by the learned counsel for the enterer that there are admissions in the record that the protestants have no title to the land entered, and that, under the ruling in Johnson (57)v. Wescott, 139 N.C. 29, the protest should be dismissed and the enterer permitted to take out his grant. We fail to find any such admission in the record. It is admitted that the protestants on the trial failed to connect themselves by evidence with the possession of Ben Etheridge, Barbara Frost, or Ned Bowser, but that is far from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. MakelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. McCormick v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  3. McNamee v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Walker v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Ashley v. . SumnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Entry No. 49 of WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API