Dupignac v. Quick
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court, affirming a judgment of the City Court, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, 'and against the defendant, .‘after a trial by jury.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
The plaintiff brings this action as the committee of the estate of one Frederick Duhrkop, adjudged a lunatic, to recover the amount of a promissory note for .$1,000, made by the defendant- and delivered to said .Duhrkop, .January 22, 1898, payable ■ two months after date to the order of Diihrkop. There • is .no dispute as to the facts in the Cáse. The answer -admits the making of the note in question, and that it has not been paid. It was-urged by.the appellant upon the argument and in his brief, that, the plaintiff “ failed to show that he .ever became the- owner of the note* or that he -had…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Read v. . Marine BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Koepke v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by1 opinion
- Church v. StevensAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907