Anderson v. Associated Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
There are virtually two appeals to be disposed of, because the issues in each of the controversies in which the parties are engaged are quite different, so they are considered separately in this opinion. The first controversy relates to the respective interests of the parties in a building and the second to claimed broker’s commissions. For convenience, reference is made to the parties in the singular, because the spouses are but nominal parties and because, on the defense side, the partnership may be regarded as a single defendant.
I. Appeal Relating to Interest in the Building General…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Stevenson v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Mandeville v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bohm v. Dolata (In Re Dolata)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Develop-Amatic Engineering v. REPUBLIC MORTGAGECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Workmon Construction Co. v. WeirickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Develop-Amatic Engineering v. Republic Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970