Legal Opinion
United States v. Foreman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 2, 1998No. 96 CR. 1209(HB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion And order
BAER, District Judge.
Defendant Michael Foreman (“Foreman”) moves for an order granting the following relief: (1) suppression of the physical evidence seized from Foreman’s vehicle at or after his arrest on December 10, 1996; (2) suppression of all statements made by Foreman to any law enforcement personnel after his arrest on December 10, 1996. On January 26-28,1998,1 held a suppression hearing on this matter. For the reasons set forth below Foreman’s motion to suppress the evidence seized from his vehicle is denied, and his motion to suppress certain post-arrest statements…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Jose Aldalberto Melgar, A/K/A Jose Aldalberto Melgar-CamposCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BanksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Johnson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- United States v. MelgarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998