Legal Opinion

Basily v. Smithsonian Institution

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 22, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-3722Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NASR BASILY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-3722 (CRC) SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, Defendant. OPINION Plaintiff Nasr Basily filed a pro se civil complaint against the Smithsonian Institution in the District of Columbia Superior Court, seeking damages for a workplace injury he suffered during his employment with the Smithsonian. See Notice of Removal of a Civil Action, ECF No. 1, at 6–7. The Smithsonian removed Basily’s case to this Court pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1) and filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  2. Thomas C. Fox v. Marion D. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Johnson v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API