Legal Opinion

Fonda v. Canal Appraisers

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1828PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for the allowance of a certiorari. Fonda being ^le owner and possessor of a farm in the town of Halfmoon, En the county of Saratoga, through which the Champlain canal passes, in the year 1835, presented a statement of the damages sustained by him in consequence of the construction of that work, and for which he claimed compensation, to S. Young, Esq. a canal commissioner and one of the board of appraisers, which account consisted of various items, amounting to upwards…

Read the full summary

Motion for the allowance of a certiorari. Fonda being ^le owner and possessor of a farm in the town of Halfmoon, En the county of Saratoga, through which the Champlain canal passes, in the year 1835, presented a statement of the damages sustained by him in consequence of the construction of that work, and for which he claimed compensation, to S. Young, Esq. a canal commissioner and one of the board of appraisers, which account consisted of various items, amounting to upwards of $500, besides a claim for the loss of six acres of land, appropriated to the canal. In February, 1837, and not…

1Opinion of the Court

Where the caappralsefT^the damages of an individual without giving him an opportunity to be heard or to produce testimony, the court allowed a certiorari.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gambling v. Board of PoliceNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. People ex rel. Gambling v. Board of Police for the Metropolitan Police DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  3. People ex rel. Board of Education v. HooperNew York Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API