Legal Opinion

St. Louis County v. McBride & Son, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1972No. 34459PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Chief Judge.

The issue in this case is whether Section 1003.167(6), St. Louis County Revised Ordinance is so vague, indefinite and uncertain as to make it unenforceable and thereby void. The ordinance reads as follows:

“No dumping, accumulation or storage of trash, cans, refuse, garbage, junk, inoperative machinery or vehicles or other such waste material shall be permitted within any district except in authorized sanitary landfills. The dumping and accumulation of building demolition material may be permitted within any district when authorized under the provisions set forth in Chapter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Eagleton v. McQueenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Ex Parte Diemer v. WeissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferguson Police Officers Ass'n v. City of FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. ShellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. City of Independence v. RichardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. MID-STATE DISTRIBUTING, CO. v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. City of Manchester v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API