Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. C5-84-1587PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is from that portion of a dissolution judgment and decree dealing with child support and the division of property. The court, in a bifurcated proceeding, had earlier awarded joint physical custody, each parent having custody for approximately 6 months. We affirm the property division and reverse and remand the trial court’s determination of child support.

FACTS

Theophanis (Theo) Hortis and Loretta Hortis were married in 1969, and have two sons, ages 12 and 9. The court following a custody hearing awarded joint physical custody of the boys, giving…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Letourneau v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Larson-Roberts Electric Co., Inc. v. BurdickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of C.M.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Marriage of Valento v. ValentoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Marriage of Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Marriage of Currey v. CurreyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Marriage of Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API