Legal Opinion

Boal v. Price Waterhouse & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1985No. B006866PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment adverse to him in an action to recover alleged retirement benefits. We reverse.

Plaintiff had been a long term employee and, from July 1, 1957, until his resignation on June 30, 1969, a partner in defendant firm. At that date he was 53 years of age. The formal retirement plan of defendant provided retirement benefits for partners who had been in that status for 15 years and had attained the age of 60. The plan also provided that the firm’s executive committee could approve benefits at an earlier time. Plaintiff’s contention in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Rincon EV Realty LLC v. CP III Rincon Towers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Gann v. Williams Brothers Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Winston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Amoco Chemical Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API