Legal Opinion
Schwarz v. Kogan
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 12, 1998No. 96-3276PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
This lawsuit arises out of a rule of professional responsibility enacted by the Supreme Court of Florida for the purpose of regulating the conduct of members of the Florida Bar. The rule, in pertinent part, requires Bar members to report their compliance with certain aspirational goals regarding the provision of legal services to the poor. Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Rowe Schwarz, an attorney and member of the Florida Bar proceeding pro se, filed this action against the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Florida, essentially seeking declaratory and injunctive relief…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stanley Haves, Marjorie Haves, His Wife v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Parker v. Connors Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Sequoia Books, Inc. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thomas F. Worthy v. The City of Phenix City, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- PBT Real Estate, LLC v. Town of Palm BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- McElrath v. BurleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, P.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2015
- Foley v. Orange CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.