Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Codero

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 9, 1976Published

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants’ appeal from an order of a single justice by which he refused to disturb the stipulation of the parties (approved by him three months earlier, after hearing) as to the “sole issue” which would be argued by the defendants on their late appeal must be dismissed because the ruling complained of was interlocutory (“manifestly" so according to the defendants’ present brief). Giacobbe v. First Coolidge Corp. 367 Mass. 309, 312-313 (1975). Sheinkopf v. Eskin, 367 Mass. 573, 574 (1975). See also Rollins Environmental Servs. Inc. v. Superior Court, 368 Mass. 174, 181 (1975); Corbett v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Joseph Giacobbe v. First Coolidge Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Tisei v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  4. Corbett v. KargmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. Sheinkopf v. EskinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API