Legal Opinion

McDonald v. American Red Cross

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 4, 2007No. Civil Action 04-1988 (RWR)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERTS, District Judge.

Plaintiff James McDonald brought this action against his employer, the American Red Cross (“Red Cross”), alleging that the Red Cross violated District of Columbia law and its own human resources policies by honoring an earnings withholding order issued by the California Franchise Tax Board (“CFTB”). The Red Cross has moved to dismiss this complaint, arguing that the complaint states no cause of action against the Red Cross, among other things. Because the complaint fails to state a violation of any duty enforceable against the Red Cross, the Red…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. KRAMER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Ikam, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Steven R. Perles PC v. Kagy, Anne MarieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API