Rae v. Heilig Theatre Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Robert Gr. Morrow, Judge. In Banc. This is an action by plaintiff,. Alexander C. Rae, against the defendant company to recover the sum of $500, as the reasonable value of services rendered to the defendant. The defendant denies the rendition of any services by plaintiff for it. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. The court found in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $215 and from a consequent judgment defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s testimony in chief, counsel for defendant submitted a motion for a judgment of nonsuit. There were several exceptions saved to the rulings of the court relating to the materiality of the testimony. The cause having been tried by the court, we do not understand that there is any question, concerning the admissibility of evidence, presented for determination except in so far as the same bears upon the matter of the nonsuit. There is no controversy in regard to the findings of fact made by the court upon the trial of the cause without a jury being of the same force…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- McLeod v. DespainOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- La Grande National Bank v. BlumOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Aerne v. GostlowOregon Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Real Estate Loan Fund Oreg. Ltd. v. HevnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Start v. Shell Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Thomas v. Smith-Wagoner Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.