State ex rel. Veale v. Paul
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; James A. McCi/cjbe, judge.
1ConcurrenceHaRvey, J.
I concur in the result. The controlling features 'of this case lead to a definite conclusion and leave no room for speculation as to what might have been intended.
It is the settled law in this state, and generally, that in the absence of special statutory authority, acting under the general statutes to lay out streets and highways, municipal and county officials have no authority to lay out a street or' highway longitudinally upon the right of way of a railroad company. (U. P. Rly. Co. v. Kindred, 43 Kan. 134, 135, 23 Pac. 112; City of Bridgeport v. New York & New Haven R. R. Co., 36 Conn.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Bridgeport v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- City of Fort Wayne v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Hays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. KindredSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.