Legal Opinion

Chase v. Cummingham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 5, 1978No. 77-1409PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 304(b) (3) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110A, par. 304(b)(3)), defendant Ralph Burgholzer appeals from the denial of his petition pursuant to section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 110, par. 72), which sought to vacate a default judgment. The sole issue on review is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the petition.

On October 20, 1972, Joseph Chase, plaintiff, and Ralph Burgholzer, defendant, were involved in an automobile accident. On July 3, 1972, plaintiff filed suit against both defendant and defendant’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. George F. Mueller & Sons, Inc. v. OstrowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Chmielewski v. MarichIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Danforth v. Checker Taxi Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Dann v. GumbinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. Airoom, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. VincentIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. American Reserve Corp. v. HollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of CarlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Davis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API