Legal Opinion
The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1981No. 78-3139, 78-3595 and 80-3260PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Chief Judge.
We deal here with three petitions filed by The Dow Chemical Company seeking review of decisions of respondent, United States Environmental Protection Agency, under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (Supp. II 1978). These decisions designated Midland County as a “nonattainment area” (Appeal Nos. 78-3139 and 78-3595) and refused to approve a state approved revision of Michigan’s “State Implementation Plan” (Appeal No. 80-3260). These appeals were consolidated by order of this court when it became apparent that they presented basically the same issue.
We recognize…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Missouri v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Kennecott Copper Corporation, Nevada Mines Division, McGill Nevada v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walker v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Baldwin-United Corp. v. Adams (In Re Baldwin-United Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Sicherman v. Falkenberg (In Re Falkenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Walker v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984