Legal Opinion

United States v. Walker

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1904No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

This was a suit upon a bond in the penal sum. of $250, given to secure the faithful performance of a contract to deliver certain machinery to the Mare Island Navy Yard. The verdict is for $370, made up of $220.84 principal, and $149.16 interest thereon for about 11 years, and the question for consideration is whether the plaintiff may recover more than the penal sum named in the bond. So far as the surety is concerned, the limit of its liability may perhaps be the penal sum — no such question is now raised in its behalf — but I think that the principal is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perit v. WallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  2. New Holland Turnpike Co. v. Lancaster CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  3. Weikel v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  4. Randle v. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haywood v. MaschkeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API