Legal Opinion

United States v. Hooper

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 12, 1969No. Crim. No. 7055PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The defendant, aggrieved by an allegedly unlawful search for and seizure of contraband whiskey by federal authorities herein, has moved to quash the search warrant and suppress for use as evidence against him the contraband thus obtained. Rule 41(e), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. No less than 13 grounds are listed by the defendant in support of this motion. The Court received evidence necessary to a decision on the motion, idem., on April 21, 1969.

The Court finds and concludes that the warrant is sufficient on its face. It was not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Frank Roosevelt HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HubbardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  2. State v. WiseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  4. Rawlings v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rawlings v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API