Warren v. Postel
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This action is upon a street assessment, and the defendant appeals from the judgment upon the judgment roll.
The defendant claims that he was assessed for too much, his assessment being $220.50, while he thinks he should be held for only $105.67.
He owns a lot at the intersection of Jersey and Noe Streets in San Francisco, thus having frontage on both streets.
September 19, 1887, the board of supervisors declared its intention to do certain work on Jersey Street between Noe and Douglas Streets, being the work for which plaintiff’s assessment was made. It was ordered to be done October…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kreling v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- Empire Securities Co. v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920