Legal Opinion

Davis v. Forman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 14, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Mon. Chas. Claflin Alim, Judge. (1) There was no issue “made up” in accordance with the statute on which the opinion of a jury could be taken.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Mon. Chas. Claflin Alim, Judge. (1) There was no issue “made up” in accordance with the statute on which the opinion of a jury could be taken. R. S. 1899, secs. 691 and 692. What the statute contemplates is shown by Besshears v. Rowe, 46- Mo. 501. What the court really did was to try the whole ease by jury — a course sufficiently characterized by Bray v. Thatcher, 28 Mo. 129. (2) The delay of respondent for more than three years to repudiate and rescind is, under the facts in evidence, negligence and acquiescence, barring the right to the…

1Opinion of the CourtYalliant, J.

— This is a suit in equity to rescind a transaction whereby the plaintiff purchased of defendants 100 shares of the capital stock of the National *33Bank of Commerce of Kansas City, on the ground of fraud which plaintiff alleges was practiced on him hy the defendants. In the transaction complained of the plaintiff gave his note for $31,000' which is now held hy defendant Forman and on which Forman has sued the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s petition specifies the alleged fraudulent acts and prays that the contract of purchase be rescinded and that defendant Forman be enjoined from prosecuting his suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Judd v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Bronson v. WanzerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Keithley v. KeithleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Weeke v. SendenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Union Pac. Railroad Co. v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Yeomans v. HerrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Thaler v. NiedermeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Fisher v. SeitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API