Legal Opinion

Larson v. Grossman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1992No. 92-1826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner requests a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to grant a motion to substitute counsel. We grant the writ.

This dispute involves the manner in which petitioner’s counsel in a personal injury suit left his former firm, taking petitioner as his client. The former firm complained loudly that the attorney’s conduct and actions were unethical and, if the allegations are true, illegal. When petitioner moved to substitute his attorney for the attorney’s former firm, the trial court denied the same based upon the allegations of how petitioner’s attorney had acquired the file from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Pantori, Inc. v. StephensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Chauvet v. Estate of ChauvetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FLA. UNEMP. APPEALS COMM.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Davis v. MeeksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API