Coffin v. McIntosh
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the- district court of tbe fourth district and from an order refusing a new trial, Hon. James A. Miner, judge. The opinion states the facts except the following: The complaint was upon two causes of action. First, money had and received in the sum of $750; second, money had and received in the sum of $1,025. The answer denied the first cause of action.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the- district court of tbe fourth district and from an order refusing a new trial, Hon. James A. Miner, judge. The opinion states the facts except the following: The complaint was upon two causes of action. First, money had and received in the sum of $750; second, money had and received in the sum of $1,025. The answer denied the first cause of action. As to the second cause of' action, the answer alleged that defendant and plaintiff were co-partners in buying a certain piece of real estate, purchase price to be $5,636.80, one half to be paid by each. This amount was…
1Opinion of the Court
BabtCH, J.:
The plaintiff in this case brought this action to recover a certain sum of money alleged to be due him from the defendant. He set up two causes of action for money had and received. The jury rendered a verdict in his favor for the sum of $750. The defendant then moved for a new trial, which motion having been overruled he appealed to *317this court. The controversy grew out of a real-estate transaction. The evidence shows that the defendant and one Armstrong had a piece of property, and the defendant made an offer to the plaintiff to the effect that if he would loan him $200 he would…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Knauss v. CahoonUtah Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henneberger v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942