Legal Opinion
Baez v. Goldman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 9, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*305OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment entered December 13, 1996 reversed, with $30 costs, jury verdict reinstated, and matter remitted to Civil Court for the entry of an appropriate judgment.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile accident when the defendant negligently proceeded through a stop sign. After trial, the jury found that plaintiff sustained a medically determined injury or impairment that prevented him from carrying out substantially all of his customary activities for 90 of the 180 days following the accident, awarded…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Sole v. KurnikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ottavio v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Vasquez v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Sobha v. Anthos Coat Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4Cited by3 opinions
- Burke v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Flores v. BergtraumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Randhawa v. OteroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024