Legal Opinion

State v. Coby

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1994No. Nos. 20586 to 20588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the Idaho and United States constitutions require that a defendant pleading guilty to a misdemeanor be warned of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. We hold, based on recent precedent from the Idaho Supreme Court, that such a warning is not constitutionally required. However, we are also asked to decide whether the prior convictions, as shown, may be used by the state to enhance Goby’s driving under the influence and driving without privileges charges to felonies. We conclude that the state failed to make a prima…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Floyd BaloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. William Henry Taylor A/K/A Baldy Briley A/K/A William Briley TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. MaxeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. CobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CobyIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API