Wheat v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN. P. J.
The infirmities in the record as originally filed in this court, to which our attention is directed by brief of counsel for appellant, were cured by the returns made to the writ of certiorari issued from, this court on April 21, 1923. The record proper as submitted on November 29, 1923, is without error, and 'appears regular I in all things; therefore the insistence of error in this connection cannot be sustained.
It is next contended that the judgment in this case is insufficient and defective. Counsel for appellant cite no authorities in support of this insistence. The second…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Wilkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Ex parte RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Talbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Watts v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924