Dickerson v. Mangham
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Justice.
The record does not support the statement made in the plaintiff’s brief that this case involves a claim of compensation. The instrument issued by the bureau, directed to J. J. Mangham, and designated as a subpoena duces tecum, states that the inquiry and investigation that is being carried on is “as to the liability or non-liability of the employing units named above [J. J. Mangham, Bremen, Georgia, and J. J. Mangham, T/A Commercial and Exchange Bank, Bremen, Georgia], to said bureau as employers under the terms of said act.” After directing J. J. Mangham to appear and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Ex parte CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Harris v. Early CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Commissioners of Floyd County v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weiner v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. CraveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Anderson v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Weiner v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966