Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue ex rel. Satchell v. Satchell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 20, 2007No. 1D06-1374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Department of Revenue contends that the trial court erred in ordering the former wife (the nonprevailing obligee) to pay attorney’s fees and costs to the former husband (the prevailing obligor) after determining that the post-dissolution proceedings on the former husband’s motion to determine child support arrearage and overpayment did not constitute an action under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. Pursuant to section 61.16(1), Florida Statutes (2001), a prevailing obligor is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees and costs from a nonprevailing obligee in a Title TV-D case. See…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Florida Department of Revenue ex rel. Troutman v. TroutmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spano v. BruceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Florida Department of Revenue Ex Rel. James v. JamesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API