Copeland v. State

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

Defendant, Arthur E. Copeland, has filed a motion for enforcement of mandate pursuant to our decision in Copeland v. State, *318435 So.2d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), petition for review denied 443 So.2d 980 (Fla.1983).

The issue on appeal was whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress a cassette tape recording containing self-incriminating statements made by the defendant during a private conversation inside his apartment. We determined that the application and order authorizing the interception of the taped communication did not comply…