Legal Opinion

Ernst v. Kootros

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1938No. 27195. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Respondent brought this action under i 19 (e), p. 609, chapter 162, Laws of 1937, known as the unemployment compensation act, seeking to impose or collect a tax from appellant, based upon the provisions of that act and one of respondent’s regulations, known as regulation No. 2, subsection (a).

It is admitted in the case that, in 1936, or prior to January 1, 1937, appellant had eight or more persons in his employ during twenty weeks of that calendar year, but it is likewise admitted that, after January 1, 1937, he never had as many as eight individuals performing services for him within this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jensen v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Huntworth v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Long v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Fair v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re Eaton's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kasper v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bates v. McLeodWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re the Puget Sound Pilots Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API