Legal Opinion

Hoag v. . Lamont

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1875PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment against the defendants, other than Walbridge, cannot be sustained without substantially overruling Landers v.Staten Island R.R. Co. (53 N.Y., 450). The cause of action did not arise within the city of Brooklyn or the county of Kings, and there was no claim upon the trial that either of the defendants, except Walbridge, had at any time resided or that they had been served with process within that city or county. The jurisdiction of the court was made to rest, and was sustained by the City Court, upon the fact that Walbridge, one of the defendants at the time of the commencement of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Landers v. . Staten Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Baird v. HelferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Rockwell v. RaymondYonkers City Court · 1889
  4. Pierson v. . Atlantic National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Walker v. Detroit Transit Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API