Legal Opinion

People v. Lucius

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the People failed to provide him with notice of his right to testify before the Grand Jury with respect to the charge of murder in the second degree. We disagree. The District Attorney has no obligation to provide a person with notice that a matter will be presented to a Grand Jury unless such person has been arraigned in a local criminal court on a “currently undisposed of felony complaint charging an offense which is a subject of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. GreerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DizakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. CogginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. People v. SampelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Lucius v. FilionDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API