Legal Opinion

State v. Ball

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 14, 1968No. 53295PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEILER, Judge.

On a motion to vacate, under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., defendant contends his conviction and sentence should be set aside (it was affirmed on original appeal in State *266v. Ball (Mo.Sup.) 408 S.W.2d 17) on the ground the information for second degree burglary was fatally defective. He attacks the portion which alleges that he did “ * * * break into and enter a certain building, namely a building owned and occupied by Emma Creamery Company, a Missouri corporation, located and situated in the City of Emma, Saline County, Missouri * * * ” He bases this on the stipulation made at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TiptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. State v. DoolySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. State v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. State v. WingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Ball v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. State v. RistSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API