State v. Ball
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Judge.
On a motion to vacate, under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., defendant contends his conviction and sentence should be set aside (it was affirmed on original appeal in State *266v. Ball (Mo.Sup.) 408 S.W.2d 17) on the ground the information for second degree burglary was fatally defective. He attacks the portion which alleges that he did “ * * * break into and enter a certain building, namely a building owned and occupied by Emma Creamery Company, a Missouri corporation, located and situated in the City of Emma, Saline County, Missouri * * * ” He bases this on the stipulation made at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. TiptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. DoolySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- State v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State v. WingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Ball v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. RistSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.