Legal Opinion

Schendel v. Bradford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1922No. 17164Published

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The judgment rendered by the court of appeals in this case was found to be in conflict with a judgment pronounced by the court of appeals of the fourth district, sitting by assignment in Cuyahoga county, in the case of Cuyahoga Lumber Co. v. Shibilla, Admr. In the Shibilla case a verdict in the sum of $7,500 was awarded, and the administrator agreeing to accept a remittitur of $3,500, the trial court entered a judgment for the sum of $4,-000. The court of appeals finding that the judgment of $4,000 was still excessive, and against the weight of the evidence, reversed the reduced judg*390ment on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Steinbuchel v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Stafford v. Pawtucket Hair-cloth Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1862

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API