Meyer v. Strouse
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
In this action of quo warranto, the lower court entered judgment against this defendant, Doyle P. Strouse, and ordered his ouster from the office of tax collecter for the Township School District of Potter Township, Clinton County, Pennsylvania. Strouse filed this appeal.
When the case came before this Court for argument, the term of office involved had already expired. Since the only purpose of quo warranto is to try the right of the defendant to presently exercise the office con tested, and admittedly the defendant is not now entitled to this, the issue is moot…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ridley Park Shopping Center, Inc. v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Manganese Steel Forge Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Schuster v. Gilberton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Sweeney v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Leedom v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.