Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Barr Wrecking Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Defendant Barr Wrecking Corporation, a general contractor, moves to dismiss the complaint herein for legal insufficiency. The action is a representative one, brought by an insurance creditor on behalf of itself and others similarly situated to enforce a trust with respect to “ moneys heretofore or hereafter received by [said defendant] from the City of New York, or owed by the City to said defendant * * * including right of action for moneys due or to become due ” to said defendant, in connection with a certain public improvement. The action is based upon the provisions of chapter 808 of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Raymond Concrete Pile Co. v. Federation Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Dalziel v. RosenfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. New York Trap Rock Corp. v. National Bank of Far RockawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Ciavarella v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v. Nathan KoslowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc. v. Nathan KoslowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API