Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Osmer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 13, 1927No. 11,829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Osmer, defendant in error, who was plaintiff in the district court, sued and recovered judgment against Osborne by way of damages for trespass upon plaintiff’s land. Osborne asks for a supersedeas.

Osborne owned a herd of cows and pastured them on plaintiff’s land without the latter’s consent. In doing so, defendant or his hired man, with defendant’s knowledge, took down and put up plaintiff’s gate to get de fendant’s cattle through to plaintiff’s land. Osborne was present mostly every morning for several months when this was done. There was other evidence of similar import.

1. Osborne seeks to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nuckolls v. GautSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Bell v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Norton v. YoungColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Sweetman v. CooperColorado Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bolten v. GatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API