Legal Opinion

Glendora Bank v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants on a promissory note for $1,935.48. Judgment by default was rendered against the defendant Foothill Finance Corporation, as indorser and guarantor, for the full amount of the note, and from this portion of the judgment no appeal has been taken. After trial the court also rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Davis for the sum of $192.80. From this portion of the judgment only the plaintiff appeals.

The only question here involved is whether the promissory note is non-negotiable in form. If it is, the judgment must stand. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tomlin v. NealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westlake Mercantile Finance Corp. v. MerrittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. National Pumps Corp. v. American Pumps, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API