Legal Opinion

Gilliland v. Pierce Motor Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 2, 1959No. 17589PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

This action was instituted by Tillman L. Gilliland and St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, a corporation, the appellants herein, against Pierce Motor Co., Inc., the respondent herein, seeking actual and punitive damages for alleged personal injury suffered by Tillman L. Gilliland, on December 26, 1956, through the alleged negligence and willfulness of the respondent. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company, one of the appellants, was the Workmen’s Compensation Insurer of Bell Laundry, the employer of Gilliland, and was joined as a party as statutory assignee of Gilliland’s cause of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. NeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Bagwell v. McLellan Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Bradford v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. DempseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wintersteen v. Food Lion, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Bruno v. Pendleton Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Wimberley v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. Pennington v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API