State v. PADIDHAM
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Presiding Judge.
Jyothiswar Padidham was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and speeding. He moved to suppress certain evidence, including the result of an alco-sensor test administered during the traffic stop and the results of an Intoxilyzer 5000 test administered in jail. The trial court granted the motion, and the state appeals. We reverse.
The facts relevant to the motion to suppress are undisputed. On February 12, 2009, a police officer stopped Padidham’s car for speeding. When the officer approached the car, he detected an odor of alcohol and noticed that Padidham’s…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Waters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rowell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Padidham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Appling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Nagata v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Robert Earl Appling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.