Legal Opinion

People v. Lindsey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, charged with assault in the second degree (Penal Law, § 242, subds. 3, 4), was convicted of third degree assault (Penal Law, § 244, subd. 1), following the court’s instruction to the jury that it might return such a verdict. Belying on the principle stated in People v. Mussenden (308 N. Y. 558), he seeks a reversal on the ground that the evidence permitted the jury to return a verdict of guilt of second degree assault but not one of simple assault. If the defendant were correct, we would be required to reverse and direct a new trial. However, analysis of the record before us…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MussendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. People v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FugaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. United States ex rel. Presenzano v. DeeganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. United States ex rel. Feldt v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  4. People v. LinzyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API