Village of Ringwood v. Foster
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley
Defendant, Deborah Foster, appeals from the trial court’s order authorizing plaintiff, the Village of Ringwood, to demolish defendant’s building pursuant to section 11 — 31—1(a) of the Municipal Code (Code) (65 ILCS 5/11 — 31—1(a) (West 2006)). On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court’s order must be vacated because it erred in finding her building “dangerous and unsafe” under the Code, because it erred in finding that she could not reasonably repair the building, and because plaintiff did not provide the notice the Code requires. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the trial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chicago National League Ball Club, Inc. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Village of Lake Villa v. StokovichIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- First of America Bank, Rockford, N.A. v. NetschIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Best v. BestIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Board of Education of Waukegan Community Unit School District No. 60 v. OrbachAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Village of Ringwood v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- McIlvaine v. The City of St. CharlesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Wysoczan v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023